Monday, 9 February 2015

News Article Review: An Island of Debris from 2011 Japanese Tsunami heading towards U.S.



11th March 2011 wasn’t just a nuclear tragic, the earthquake and tsunami also left a heap of land waste for Japan to deal with. 5 million tons of wreckage (eg homes, boats, other remnants) as has entered the ocean. Of which, 70% of the trash has sunk near the coast of Japan. The other 30%, or 1 million tons, which is about the size of Texas is floating in the Pacific Ocean. This pile of trash is expected to arrive at Hawaiian islands (on the western shores of America) after floating in the ocean for 2 years (refer to Image 1). Lighter and more mobile trash has already been documented to have reached the shores of California, Oregon and British Comlumbia (Mail Online, 2013).

Image 1: Trash from Japan tsunami, the size of Texas, floating towards Hawii (Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2013)

I have found a video showing timeline of various types of rubbish expected to reach America. The amount of debris shown is astonishing.


Trajectory of the rubbish is expected to slip into the North Pacific Gyre. Once it oscillates the gyre for 5 years, it is predicted that the trash main destination will be on the coastline of Hawaii (Ocean Conservancy, 2015). This means Hawaii will be thrown to deal with this migratory waste, and this could potentially be considered a transboundary pollution. Monitoring the garbage travel path is getting tougher as the debris is influenced greatly by wind direction. Currently, the debris are so dispersed over the large ocean that “it could no longer be tracked by satellite” (ibid.). Hence, differentiating debris from Japan tsunami and normal waste is tough. Quantifying the environmental impact from 2011 tsunami is thus almost impossible.

What scientists are most concerned is the harm the debris could bring to our marine ecosystem. As wind and water currents breakdown the debris to microparticles and microplastics, marine animals could ingest these tiny particles as it is mistaken for food (Tran, 2014). Also, derelict fishing gears can trap and threaten marine species and seabirds. As the debris heads ashore, coastal reefs could be damaged and invasive species introduced. Threat of invasive species from tsunami was never a concern prior to 2011, as scientists believed coastal species would not survive long in oceanic environment. However, a dock containing many coastal species arrived on Oregon coast on 3rd June 2012, dispelling the initial assumption (Ocean Conservancy, 2015). The repercussions from 2011 Japan tsunami is widespread and is expected to persist for long.

From here, we understand that debris from 2011 Japan tsunami has became a transboundary marine pollution. This natural disaster not only impacted Japan itself, it also affects neighbouring nations. Though the debris is not radioactive, as it was swallowed into the ocean before Fukushima nuclear plant exploded, we should be wary of potential chemical reactions it could result. Microplastics and microparticles in the ocean may release toxic substance, further harming the marine ecosystem. Land pollution can ultimately lead to water pollution. As the rubbish persists in our waters, we should call for a concerted effort from the international community to address this problem.

References
Mail Online,. 'Texas-Sized Debris Island From Japanese Tsunami Headed For The US'. N.p., 2013. Web.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Response.restoration.noaa.gov,. 'New NOAA Model Improves Understanding Of Potential Paths Of Japan Tsunami Debris | Response.Restoration.Noaa.Gov'. N.p., 2015. Web.

Oceanconservancy.org,. 'Ocean Conservancy: Tsunami Debris 101'. N.p., 2015. Web.

Tran, Cam. 'Scientists Track Debris From 3-Year-Old Japan Tsunami'. KITV. N.p., 2014. Web. Apr. 2015.


Friday, 6 February 2015

From water and Air Pollution to Soil Pollution: Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Meltdown

This post is dedicated to evaluating the impacts originating from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant meltdown. Approximately 200,000 people has been forced to evacuate (Terrell, 2014) from home until last year, 2014, when the government lifted the order for 300 people in homes at Tamura City (Oskin, 2014). New set of socio-environmental problems arises with 70,000 nuclear refugees (National Geographic, 2011) as most plan to start life anew elsewhere (BBC, 2015). It would be a tough battle for most as reports has shown that “more people have died from stress-related illnesses and other maladies after the disaster than from injuries directly linked to the disaster” (The Japan Times, 2014). Chronic suffering is apparent and this is not limited to those directly affected by the disaster, it is applicable to almost everyone. We might be far away from the source of disaster but radioactive leakage from the power plant has contaminated our water, air and soil.

Water Contamination

With the ‘feed and bleed’ process as outlined in my previous blog post, water has to be manually fed into the reactor for months. To make the situation worse, 3 containment pools in the reactor were leaking. In addition, initial release of contaminated water was inevitable and intentional, as TEPCO needed to make room for storage of more contaminated water.

With so much contaminated water, TEPCO had a hard time disposing the water safely. Reports has mentioned that 40% of the injected water boiled off whereas 60% leaked out from the bottom (World Nuclear Association, 2015). According to Japan government, 300 tons of radioactive contaminated water is leaking into the Pacific Ocean each day, equivalent to a rate of filling an Olympic-sized pool every 8 days (Kiger, 2013). The government has since issued the situation as ‘urgent’ (ibid.). What is more worrying is that water is seeping past an underground barrier, polluting groundwater and the soil.

This leakage was described to be “the largest single contribution of radionuclides to the marine environment ever observed” according to the French Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (ibid.). The groundwater is contaminated with radioactive pollutants such as caesium (Caesium-134 and Caesium-137), iodine and strontium-90 and which has exceeded international permissible levels.

(i) Caesium


Caesium tends to stay in soils and thereafter retain in plants. “Radioactive caesium bioaccumulates, bioconcentrates and biomagnifies as it moves up the food chain” (Starr, 2012). A plethora of news reports confirmed that caesium has escaped into surrounding ecosystem and tainted food products. A food check by local government between 1st April 2011 to 19th September 2011, 12% of food items exceeded Caesium limits (Aoki, 2012). Half of these food items originated from Fukushima Perfecture. A wide spectrum of food products that are affected includes spinach, tea leaves, milk, beef and freshwater fish up to 200 miles from Fukushima (Starr, 2012). 15 months following the disaster, 56% of Japanese fish catches are found to be contaminated with Caesium, with 9.3% of it exceeding Japan’s acceptable level of 100 Becquerels (Bq) per kilogram (Roslin, 2012) (refer to Figure 1). What is of notable concern is that the fishes are exported overseas. Canada has imported $37,000 worth of salmon from Japan in the first half of 2012 and its spread is extending. Experts have predicted that migratory salmon from Japan will reach the North American West coast by 2017 (ibid.). In a bid to address this problem, the Japan government has placed bans on certain zones from fishing and TEPCO has installed 109 concrete walls to prevent further leakage into surrounding harbor. The situation has since improved as 0.6% of fishes caught offshore exceeded the ceiling limit (as compared to 56%) and caesium levels in food supply dropped from 500 Bq/kg to 100 Bq/kg (World Nuclear Association, 2015).

Figure 1: Japan Fisheries contaminated with Caesium (Source: Japan’s Fisheries Agency, June 2012)

Not only are food items contaminated with caesium, groundwater is polluted too. TEPCO revealed that 310 Bq/litre of caesium-134 and 650 Bq/litre of caesium-137 was detected in groundwater. This exceeds the local provisional limit of 60 Bq/litre and WHO’s guideline of 10 Bq/litre (Kiger, 2013). Note that drinking water of 300 Bq/litre is equivalent to a year’s exposure to natural background radiation, or 10 to 15 chest X-rays. The World Health Organization has warned the public of associated health concerns from the ingestion of radioactive caesium. As retrieved from their website, “radioactive caesium can linger in the environment for many years and could continue to present a longer term problem for food, and food production, and a threat to human health” (WHO, 2011). The half-life of caesium-137 is 30 years while caesium-134 half life is 2.5 years ()World Nuclear Association, 2015). Both tends to bioaccumulate in and heart, endocrine tissues, kidneys, small intestines, pancreas, spleen and liver (Starr, 2012). Children being the most susceptible group. Exposure to such radioactive caesium can consequently elevate the risk of cancer (WHO, 2011). Already 104 children has been diagnosed with thyroid cancer in Fukushima and the numbers are peaking (ENE news, 2014).

We can expect caesium to persist in our environment as it takes centuries to decay. Though TEPCO has constructed a groundwater bypass, the pant is still leaking 0.3teraBq per month. This is considered a commendable effort by TEPCO as initially 15,000 teraBq was spewing into the sea (Kiger, 2013). Based on figures, the aftermath of Fukushima can be worst than Hiroshima, which only released 89teraBq of caseium when it exploded. Scientists are thus concerned with toxic radiation in our environment and has confirmed that 70% of Japan’s territory is polluted (ENE news, 2013). With the intrusion of caesium in Pacific Ocean, water pollution could potentially spread across borders and to the whole world.

(ii) Iodine

Iodine contamination is found in food but this is of less concern as compared to caesium. Radioactive iodine half-life is 8 days and it decays naturally in weeks. However, ingestion of iodide can result in elevated risk of cancer, as it bioaccumulates at the thyroid glands (WHO, 2011).

(iii) Strontium

Strontium-90 and tritium is detected in groundwater and food products. Its prevalence is 100 times more pervasive than caesium at the plant site (Kiger, 2013). Strontium-90 being a toxic carcinogen has since been found in sardines bones and can bioaccumulate in the food chain (Dobias, 2014).

Air Contamination

Plumes from the plant contains radioactive isotopes and nuclides. Volatile iodine-131 is amongst the many fission products that has been released into the atmosphere (World Nuclear Association, 2015). It is carried in the plume and lands on surrounding land, contaminating the soil. The spread is widespread (refer to Image 1) but is of less concern since its half life is 8 days. However, caution should be taken as iodine can bioaccumulate in the food chain and increase the risk of cancer in humans.

Image 1: Spread of Iodine-131 around Fukushima nuclear plant (Source: Asai, 2013)

Conclusion

Water and air pollution from Fukushima power plant has resulted in soil contamination and consequently tainted food produce. With bioaccumulation and biomagnification of radioactive materials in our food chain, threat to public health is imminent. The spread from the nuclear disaster is furthered with export of food produce worldwide. With more radionuclides entering the Pacific Ocean, the situation is expected to worsen and global attention is needed in addressing a host of environmental problems it carries.


References



Oskin, Becky. 'Japan To Partly Lift Fukushima Evacuation Order'. LiveScience., 2014. Web. Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/43609-japan-lifts-fukushima-evacuation-order.html


Terrell, Rebecca. 'Fukushima Fear And Fallout'. The New American 2014. Web. Retrieved from http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/17424-fukushima-fear-and-fallout

Craft, Lucille. 'Japan's Nuclear Refugees - Pictures, More From National Geographic Magazine'. Ngm.nationalgeographic.com. N.p., 2011. Web. Retrieved from http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/12/japan-nuclear-zone/craft-text

Hayes, Rupert Wingfield. 'Fukushima Residents Doubt Plans To Rebuild'. BBC 2015. Web. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-31823187

The Japan Times,. 'Fukushima’S Appalling Death Toll'. 2014. Web. Retrieved from

Starr, Steven. 'Costs And Consequences Of The Fukushima Daiichi Disaster | PSR'. Psr.org. Web. Retrieved from http://www.psr.org/environment-and-health/environmental-health-policy-institute/responses/costs-and-consequences-of-fukushima.html

Aoki, Mizuho. 'Cesium Contamination In Food Appears To Be On Wane'. The Japan Times 2015. Web. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/09/25/reference/cesium-contamination-in-food-appears-to-be-on-wane/#.VSzbZlOUc-B

Roslin, Alex. 'Post-Fukushima, Japan's Irradiated Fish Worry B.C. Experts'. The Georgia Straight 2012. Web. Retrieved from http://www.straight.com/life/post-fukushima-japans-irradiated-fish-worry-bc-experts

ENENews,. 'Japan Paper: Now 104 Children Diagnosed With Cancer Of Thyroid In Fukushima — New Results Show 5-Fold Increase In Rate Of Suspected/Confirmed Cancers'. 2014. Web. Retrieved from http://enenews.com/japan-paper-104-children-diagnosed-cancer-thyroid-fukushima-new-results-show-5-fold-increase-rate-suspectedconfirmed-cancers-physician-concern-many-high-risk-cancers-being-found

Who.int,. 'WHO | Faqs: Japan Nuclear Concerns'. N.p., 2011. Web. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hac/crises/jpn/faqs/en/index7.html

Kim, Jin-hyun. 'Lessons From Fukushima'. The Korea Times 2015. Web. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2013/12/162_147256.html

World-nuclear.org,. 'Fukushima Accident'. Web. Retrieved from http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Safety-and-Security/Safety-of-Plants/Fukushima-Accident/

ENE News,. 'Professor: “It’S True That About 70% Of Japan’S Territory Is Polluted” By Fukushima Radioactive Material; Tokyo Contaminated With Highly Toxic Radiation — “Experts Worry About Catastrophic Impacts On Health”'. 2015. Web. Retrieved from http://enenews.com/professor-it-is-true-that-about-70-of-japans-territory-is-polluted-with-radioactive-materials-from-fukushima-tokyo-contaminated-with-highly-toxic-radiation-experts-worried-about-the


Kiger, Patrick. 'Fukushima's Radioactive Water Leak: What You Should Know'. News.nationalgeographic.com. N.p., 2013. Web. Retrieved from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/08/130807-fukushima-radioactive-water-leak/

Dobias, Peter. 'SARDINES MAY BE CONTAMINATED WITH RADIOACTIVE STRONTIUM FROM FUKUSHIMA - Dr. Dobias Natural Healing'. Dr. Dobias Natural Healing. Web. Retrieved from http://peterdobias.com/blogs/blog/11014105-sardines-may-be-contaminated-with-radioactive-strontium-from-fukushima

Asai, Fumukazu. 'Map Shows Iodine-131 Levels In Fukushima Shortly After Disaster'. The Asahi Shimbun 2013. Web. Retrieved from http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201307020068